Posts Tagged ‘freddie mac’

Loan modifications improving but still failing

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Although the numbers are improving, a third of loans modified by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac early last year were delinquent after six months.

These loans were modified prior to implementation of Obama’s Home Affordable Modification Program.

DHW asks: Do you think loan modifications are making a difference?

It’s official: interest rates at all-time low

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Freddie Mac announced that the average 30-year mortgage interest rate hit a new record low this week at 4.71 percent. The driving force behind the rate’s decline is the government’s initiative to lower borrowing costs and strengthen the housing market.

The Federal Reserve is infusing $1.25 trillion into mortgage-backed securities in an effort to lower interest rates. However, this money is scheduled to run out next spring.

Fixed interest rates on 15-year mortgages also saw a new record low this week.  Rates fell to 4.27 percent, down from 4.29 percent last week.

DHW asks: Will these low rates encourage you to purchase or refinance a home?

Interest rates match record low

Friday, November 27th, 2009

The average interest rate for 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages fell more than a full percentage point from last year, matching a record low set in spring.

The Washing Post reported today:

  • 30-year, fixed rate mortgages averaged 4.78% this week, the lowest it has been since the  week of April 30 (Freddie Mac has been tracking this rate since 1971)
  • This same time last year, 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages averaged 5.97 percent
  • The average interest rate for 15-year, fixed-rate mortgages fell to 4.29 percent, its lowest point since Freddie Mac started tracking these rates in 1991

Search loan limits in your area from our ‘Homebuyer Center’ page.

DHW asks: Do you think rates will go even lower?

Be a patriot: purchase a home with FHA

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Besides saving yourself money, using an FHA endorsed loan to purchase a home may be the most patriotic thing you can do.  Hear me out. In the late 1990s, the government correctly sought to increase homeownership. Naively, the government did not look to the FHA to take charge in this call to action. Instead, they relied on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to broaden the types of loans they purchased from mortgage lenders, relaxing underwriting guidelines and pushing the moral envelope. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had a fiduciary responsibility to look after the well being of their shareholders, not the consumer. As such, the loans created over the next few years put an emphasis on profit — excessive prepayment penalties, interest only and “teaser” rates. The appeal to consumers: These new loans came with little or no money down.

In FY 2009, FHA insured 30% of total purchases and 20% of total refinances in the housing market (it does not lend its own money). Here are just some of the benefits of using the FHA.

  • Low down payment of 3.5 percent. The down payment can even be a gift from a relative, non-profit organization or employer.
  • Interest rates are competitive with  conventional mortgages
  • Guidelines allow buyers to qualify for more home than conventional loans
  • There is no income cap for FHA
  • Fixed interest rate with no prepayment penalty

Uncle Sam NEEDS YOU!

When you use the FHA to purchase a home, you pay an upfront mortgage insurance premium (MIP). This upfront premium is commonly rolled back into the mortgage to avoid an out-of-pocket expense. In addition, you pay a monthly MIP. The monthly MIP is less expensive than private mortgage insurance (PMI) for a conventional loan with 5 percent down (if you can still find a lender originating 95% LTV conventional loans). These MIP fees generate $1 billions in revenue for the government every year.

The FHA loan can also be used to finance home improvements for purchases and refinances under its 203K program.

Find FHA approved lenders in your area

Find FHA loan limits in your area

DHW asks: Have you used the FHA to purchase or refinance a home? How was your experience?

Stevens: FHA sublime, not subprime

Monday, November 16th, 2009

During a speech to the National Association of Realtors in San Diego, FHA Commissioner David Stevens said his agency is not headed for the same fate as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or the subprime sector. Concerns about the FHA’s financial well being were raised last week when it was revealed in an independent audit that the agency’s funds were below legal guidelines.

The Commissioner sought to minimize these concerns, reporting the agency had $31 billion in capital – an increase of $3.5 billion from a year ago.

Stevens went on to say that the FHA is  “the only participant in home financing services in the U.S. economy that hasn’t needed a bailout, hasn’t needed (funds from the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program), hasn’t needed special assistance and is still completely self-sustaining.”

The AP reports the FHA has insured almost 25 percent of all new loans made in 2009. Eighty-percent of these loans represent first time home buyers.

Stevens rejected comparisons between the FHA and the subprime market.  “Nothing could be further from the truth,” he said, stressing the FHA has far more stringent underwriting guidelines for the loans it insures.

As the unemployment rate has risen, so have FHA’s losses. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, approximately 17 percent of FHA borrowers are at least one payment behind or in foreclosure. This compares with 13 percent for all loans.

The FHA does not make loans. It insures against default, taking much of the risk away from lenders. FHA loans have grown in popularity in recent years as credit markets have tightened up. The agency’s 203K rehab loan is also growing in popularity as more first-time home buyers purchase foreclosures.

DHW asks: Do you think the FHA is at risk of needing a government bailout?

Audit: FHA’s reserve funds way below what law requires

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

From The Washington Post : ‘FHA’s cash reserves have dropped well below amount required by law, audit shows’

DHW asks: Do you think the FHA’s reserves will hit zero?

FHA loan limits in your area

Foreclosures down but not out

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

U.S. foreclosures sank for a third consecutive month in October, down 3% from the previous month. However, many feel this trend will not continue. Foreclosure notices were curtailed in many states due to temporary, legislative intervention. CNBC reported Nevada foreclosures “dropped 26 percent from the previous month because of new legislation requiring mediation before initiating foreclosure proceedings.” Illinois had similar legislation, but foreclosure notices skyrocketed there 56% in October from the previous month.   

States leading in foreclosure:

  1. Nevada
  2. California
  3. Florida
  4. Arizona
  5. Idaho

DHW asks: Are foreclosures down in your area?

Realogy CEO just doesn’t get it.

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

In a CNBC interview this morning, Realogy CEO, Richard Smith, called on FHA to increase its minimum required down payment of 3.5%. Mr Smith suggested the ‘risk profile’ will have to change to stave off foreclosures. This argument only perpetuates the myth that those who put less money down are somehow less attached to their home than those who put down a significant amount. Mr Smith should have taken the opportunity to call on the administration and Congress to cure the real problems that cause mortgage delinquencies.

The Urban Institute, a Washington D.C. based think tank, issued a study recently that revealed some interesting, though not surprising, data. Those who put little or no money down tend to be more poor than those who put, say, 20% down. They are also less likely to have health insurance. Someone who has health insurance is more likely to miss less work due to an illness than someone who has no insurance. This is only one example cited in the Institute’s report. 

Although many pundits, including Mr Smith, suggest the nation’s recovery is tied to housing, it is not. It is tied to job creation. You cannot have a 10% unemployment rate and expect to have a stabilizing housing market.

Reology is the world’s largest brokerage operator. They own Coldwell Banker, Century 21, Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate and ERA. 

DHW asks: Do you think the FHA should increase its minimum required down payment?

FHA loosens condo project guidelines

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

The Miami Herald reported the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) is temporarily relaxing underwriting guidelines for some condominium communities. The changes are intended to increase condo sales and put occupants in otherwise vacant units. 

DHW asks: Do you agree with the FHA’s decision to relax condo underwriting guidelines?

Citi and USA Today: 1 in 5 dressed like they want it

Monday, November 9th, 2009

Last week, CitiMortgage suggested in a USA Today article that 1 in 5 homeowners currently in default of their mortgage are doing so strategically or voluntarily. They cite Sharon Sakson as one of these ’strategic defaults.’ Ms Sakson was laid off as a television writer and producer. After losing her job, she ‘burned through her savings to pay her mortgage.’ Burned through her savings. Ms Sakson is possibly the worst strategist I know. She strategically lost her job then voluntarily burned through her savings to make her mortgage payments. She eventually ‘walked away’ from her New Jersey home.

Clearly, we’re made to think Sakson and others who ‘walk away’ from their homes are bad people. How CitiMortgage and other lenders can get away with this type of character  assassination is beyond belief. Even more unbelievable, USA Today refuses to call lenders out on this practice. 

Readers should also note the USA Today article is not entirely accurate with regard to the seven-year wait period. If the foreclosed property is a primary residence, a borrower may be eligible for a new mortgage in five years.

DHW asks: USA Today’s decision to ‘blame the victim’ struck a nerve with a lot of folks at DesperateHouseWise. Have you had to walk away from your home?